73 disciplines. Every one of them reads your answers.
You answer the consultation once. All 73 go through what you said. Around eight to twelve end up in your reading, three or four of them on each of your three findings. After that you can ask it anything you like, as often as you like and it does the same thing again.
Send the same tired woman to a heart specialist and to an acupuncturist and they will notice different things. Not because one of them is right, but because they walked in asking different questions. That is why a reading uses several of them instead of picking one.
They are not all equally well evidenced and we say which is which. A trial of thirty people and forty years of practice are both worth knowing about. They are not the same thing.
Somebody arrives tired
Here is what four of these would want to know about her.
Conventional medicine wants her bloods done and it wants the iron number itself rather than somebody telling her it is fine.
Chinese medicine wants to know which hour she wakes, because three in the morning means something different from one.
Occupational health wants to know whether she gets any say over her week. Having a lot to do is one thing. Having no say over any of it is harder on a body.
Nutrition wants to know what she drinks with her dinner, because a cup of tea with a meal stops her taking in the iron that was in it.
None of those four would have asked the other three.
We don't ask which discipline is right. We ask what each one notices that the others might miss.
Exist Better isn't a panel of specialists and nobody from each of these fields reviews your reading. What each discipline knows is widely published: what an endocrinologist looks for, the questions a gastroenterologist would ask, the tests they might suggest and when something needs to be seen. Your Blueprint reads your answers through each of those lenses and looks for patterns. It doesn't diagnose.
When something points towards a professional, your reading says so and tells you who: your GP, a specialist or a practitioner who can help. For some people the right next step is an audio, an article or a change to their day. For others it is an appointment. Your Blueprint helps you tell which.
No one discipline can fully explain a human life.
A Blueprint exists because every discipline notices something different.
There are 73 of them and the lines between them are the point. Some are describing the same thing in different languages. Some disagree. Your Blueprint sits where they meet.
Your answers go through all 73 of them and so does anything you ask afterwards. Not the four that suit the topic, the four that suit you. Your pillars, the patterns underneath them and the traditions your own reading has already raised decide which ones are worth opening.
You are also told which ones were considered and set aside, because a narrow answer should say so rather than look like the whole picture. Two people asking the same question rarely receive the same four disciplines.
All of them, in 8 families
Every perspective a question is read against.
Ask your Blueprint anything and all of these are considered before the ones with something particular to say are chosen.
The families matter for one reason. Disciplines inside a family tend to share their assumptions, so when two of them agree it is often the same idea twice. When two different families arrive at the same place, that is worth a great deal more. The number beside each name is how many pieces of reasoning the store holds for it.
Those figures overlap on purpose and do not add up to the size of the store. One piece of reasoning about iron absorption is read by conventional medicine, gastroenterology, nutrition science and Ayurveda at once, so it is counted under each of them. The store holds 715 pieces in all.
° Named by the reasoning engine itself rather than in the 73 it sweeps when you ask it a question.
One of these is here as a tradition rather than as a treatment. Homeopathy is read for what it notices about a person. It is not presented as having an effect the evidence does not support and saying that plainly is the condition of including it at all.
In more depth
The 12 that shape a Blueprint most often.
These 12 come up in most readings. Read them and you will have a fair idea of what yours will sound like. The other 61 are just as real and they turn up when they are the ones that fit you.
Conventional medicine
Is there something here that needs treating and is it dangerous?
How this appears in your Blueprint. Every safety route in the platform. If something in your answers should be seen by a doctor, this is the discipline that says so and it overrules everything else.
Lifestyle medicine
What is the ordinary shape of this life doing to this body?
How this appears in your Blueprint. Most of the evidence behind the steps your Blueprint suggests and the reason it looks at six areas of your life at once rather than at a symptom.
Circadian biology
Not how much, but when?
How this appears in your Blueprint. The reason a Blueprint asks when you see daylight and why morning light is so often the first step rather than an evening routine.
Psychology
What is this experience like from the inside and what keeps it going?
How this appears in your Blueprint. The way your Blueprint reads patterns as things being held in place rather than as faults and most of its voice.
Behavioural science
Knowing what to do changes very little. What actually changes behaviour?
How this appears in your Blueprint. Why your Blueprint gives you three steps in an order rather than fifteen suggestions and why it says what to leave alone for now.
Neuroscience
What is the machinery doing while this is happening?
How this appears in your Blueprint. The explanations that make a pattern make sense, always labelled as a mechanism rather than as proof.
Nutrition
What is this person actually eating and what is it doing?
How this appears in your Blueprint. Specific reasoning where food is genuinely involved and the confidence to tell you plainly when it is not.
Functional medicine
Is there one process underneath these several symptoms?
How this appears in your Blueprint. The habit of asking what would account for the most, which is the central move your Blueprint makes.
Environmental medicine
What is around this person that nobody has thought to look at?
How this appears in your Blueprint. A question about your surroundings that no health service asks, kept proportionate. Most of the time the honest answer is that the room is fine and the lever is elsewhere.
Traditional Chinese medicine
What is the pattern and what is its timing?
How this appears in your Blueprint. Questions about pattern and timing that Western practice rarely asks. Offered as a way of thinking and labelled as one.
Ayurveda
What kind of constitution is this and what does the day ask of it?
How this appears in your Blueprint. The instinct that rhythm and individual difference matter, which shows up in how your Blueprint sequences things.
Herbal medicine
What has long use and what does the research say about it now?
How this appears in your Blueprint. A small number of specific, evidenced options, always with the interaction question attached and never as a first move.
Why it is all of them
Most people only ever get one of these.
You see your GP and you get conventional medicine. You see an acupuncturist and you get Chinese medicine. Each of them is good at something the other one is not even looking for and you will almost never get the two of them in the same room.
A Blueprint puts what each of them would have noticed about you in one place. It says which ones had something to say and it says which ones had nothing, because an answer from four disciplines should admit it is an answer from four.
One of these gives you part of the story. Four of them, on you and you start to see a life.
There is one more thing underneath all of it. A discipline is a way of looking. A system is something actually happening in your body. All 73 of these are lenses and the systems are what they are pointed at.
See the Human SystemSee how they read together.
A sample Blueprint shows four of these disciplines arriving at the same question by different routes, which is easier to recognise than to describe. The Human System is the map underneath them all.
